Hi @lucasarruda-ciandt would this work - #1474 ?

if latest isn't feasible, at least is a lot better than what it is now.
thanks for considering!

if latest isn't feasible, at least is a lot better than what it is now.

Is there any feature you would requite explicitly from >= 0.1.5 - <0.109. I can then look at it. Also wanted to ask if you can confirm that all tests passed in your build. I did see test failures (expected) and did some test changes.

Is there any feature you would requite explicitly from >= 0.1.5 - <0.109. I can then look at it

Hi @lucasarruda-ciandt , let me know. Will close the PR and we can upgrade later if not urgent.

Hi there! My mistake here, I totally relied on IA telling me tests have passed, but after you said I ran by myself and realized a few indeed failed. Btw the tests are hanging at 95% here, tried twice... haven't looked further yet. Python 3.10 (as per pyproject.toml)

Is there any feature you would requite explicitly from >= 0.1.5 - <0.109. I can then look at it. Also wanted to ask if you can confirm that all tests passed in your build. I did see test failures (expected) and did some test changes.

I maintain a private library which heavily uses databricks-sdk and recently we introduced dbt-databricks as a dev dependency and it caused a downgrade on the former due to current constraints. I don't know which features would brake 'cause I haven't tested thoroughly but i'm pretty sure it wouldn't work as often use databricks alpha features (sometimes we even have to patch databricks-sdk by ourselves bc their API has evolved and they haven't synced to the sdk yet)...

I'm used to keep dependencies as up to date as possible so I appreciate you bumping up that to the latest you can, thanks a lot!